<div dir="ltr"><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#274e13" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Dear Mårten,
Peter, and All,</font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><font size="1" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span class=""><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<p><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)" lang="EN-US">·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;line-height:normal">
</span></span><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)" lang="EN-US">The difference between Super multiview,
Plenoptics, Lightfield, Holoscopic and Full Parallax Imaging
should be made clear, at least in the context of this book
chapter. As a consequence, the structure of the chapters may
be preferred to be changed. I think this is crucial!<br>
</span></p>
</div>
</blockquote></span>
I second this opinion. I'd prefer to contribute to the light-field
part, but now I'm listed for super-multiview, as that's the term
used in MPEG. We should definitely (try to) clarify.<br></font>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"><span class=""><div><p><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)" lang="EN-US"></span></p></div></span></blockquote></div></blockquote><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#274e13" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">I agree it would be an asset to the chapter to make clear all the different nomenclatures that have been used for these technologies.</font></span></p><div><font color="#274e13" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">I had tried not to impose any particular name in this draft, since each of us would prefer to continue using our own terms.</font></div><div><font color="#274e13" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#274e13">An alternative
would be to use a more general term (e.g.: Light Field), and to divide into two groups to make clear the greatest difference
between the technologies. Then, simply to list all the names used to the same technology. For instance:</font></span></p>
<p class="" style></p><ul><li><span lang="EN-US" style><font color="#274e13"><b>Light field
with horizontal parallax:</b> Holografika’s Light-Field, Super-Multiview (adopted
by MPEG FTV)</font></span></li><li><font color="#274e13"><b style><span lang="EN-US">Light field with full parallax:</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style> Integral Photography (adopted by
MPEG FTV), Light-Field Photography (adopted by Lytro, Raytrix), Plenoptic (adopted
by Adobe, JPEG), Holoscopic (adopted by 3D-VIVANT, Arri)</span><br></font></li></ul><p></p>
<font color="#274e13"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif">(The groups would also be: </span><b style>Light field Imaging with Camera Array, </b><b style>Light field Imaging with Plenoptic Camera</b><span style>).</span></font></div><div><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size:10pt"><font color="#274e13"><br></font></span></div><div><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size:10pt"><font color="#274e13">Please
let me know your opinion and suggestions.</font></span></div><div><span style="color:rgb(39,78,19);font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size:10pt"><br></span></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><blockquote type="cite"><span class=""><div><p><font size="1"><span style="font-family:Symbol;color:rgb(31,73,125)" lang="EN-US">·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span><span style="font-family:Calibri,serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)" lang="EN-US">“Multiple Hypothesis in Displacement Intra
Prediction for Plenoptic Content” has the basis on
Displacement Intra Prediction that you once proposed. I
think you called it self-similarity prediction. Therefore, I
think we should try to merge the contents or at least
streamline the presentation and the nomenclature.
</span></font></p></div></span></blockquote></div></blockquote><div><font color="#274e13">We could adopt
the term Displacement Intra Prediction throughout the chapter, and include a
reference to the term Self-Similarity at the first occurrence (e.g., firstly proposed
as Self-Similarity Prediction).</font> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><blockquote type="cite"><span class=""><div><p><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)" lang="EN-US">
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Symbol;color:rgb(31,73,125)" lang="EN-US"><font size="1">·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></font></span><span style="font-family:Calibri,serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)" lang="EN-US"><font size="1">There might me more authors to my
contributions, but that is an easy fix.</font><span style="font-size:11pt"><u></u><u></u></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)" lang="EN-US"><u></u></span></p></div></span></blockquote></div></blockquote><div><font color="#274e13">Please feel free
to add more authors. </font></div><div><font color="#274e13"><br></font></div><div><font color="#274e13"><br></font></div><div><font color="#274e13">Best Regards,</font></div><div><font color="#274e13">Caroline.</font></div></div><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><p><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif"></span></p></div></div></div></div>
</div></div>